RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jan 14 12:46:19 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097339.html

Paul Moore wrote:
> 2010/1/14 Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk>:
>> So, can you please indicate your vote for or against incorporating PEP 391 into Python?
> 
> I've no immediate need for the feature, but it would be good to have
> something like this, so I'm +1.

I'm in the same boat as Paul, but PEP 291 provides a nice forward
compatible configuration scheme that will work with any application
configuration approach that can produce an appropriate Python dictionary.

So +1 from me too - I think the PEP has now taken this as far as
theorising can go, and the only way to learn anything further is to put
it into practice.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097339.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 391 - Please Vote!