On 1/13/2010 2:13 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> I think we should use whatever is most informative and least confusing >> to our users - we owe our allegiance to them and not to a processor vendor. > > And why do you think this is x86-64? I do not believe I have personally seen, or at least noticed, that specific term before. Something like "Release for 64-bit Windows (Win NT, 2000, XP, Vista, 7 <or whatever correct list is>) on AMD64-type processors from AMD and Intel" should be clear enough.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4