On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:25, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > * any changes needed to the issue tracker to help with the workflow? (stage > field seems like a failed experiment and we now have several effective > triage people who can help w/ guiding changes) > > -Brett > I think it would be interesting to see how people are using the tracker, or how they want to be using it. For example, there are currently over 1500 open issues with no stage set, some of which seemingly haven't been read by anyone at all. Would a properly set stage field save issues from falling into a black hole? Food for thought: according to the last tracker summary, there are over 1000 open issues with a patch, and issues stay open an average of 700 days (median 450). Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100111/a3439436/attachment-0007.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4