RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jan 12 00:16:47 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097235.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> +1 from me. (With the caveat that "time will tell" is definitely the
> ultimate answer. Plans may change unexpectedly, even though we don't
> expect them to.)
> 
> PS. I'm surprised that Martin thinks that the -3 mode in 2.6 is not
> helpful. 

That's really because I haven't even attempted to use it. Instead, the
software would fall flat on its own when running the test suite in 3.x.
IOW, I don't need 2.6 to tell me what might break when I can see 3.x
actually breaking.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-January/097235.html below:

[Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 2.7 alpha 2