On 07/01/2010 13:11, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 13:23, Nick Coghlan<ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> As Simon pointed out, while some organisations do work that way, the PSF >> isn't one of them. >> >> The PSF only requires that the code be contributed under a license that >> then allows us to turn around and redistribute it under a different open >> source license without requesting additional permission from the >> copyright holder. >> > Even if the contributed code as in this case is a method in an > existing file? How does that work, how do they keep ownership of one > method in the threading.py method? :-) > > When contributing code to Python all work remains copyright the original author. The combined work is copyright *everyone*. The PSF has a license to distribute it, which is all that is important. How you meaningfully exercise your ownership over chunks of code is left for the reader to determine... (i.e. copyright and ownership are legal terms that don't necessarily mean anything *practical* in these situations.) Michael -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4