RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 19 15:15:16 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097780.html

On 2010-02-19 14:45, Eric Smith wrote:
> Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
>> On 2010-02-19 14:10, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> Isn't mhlib itself deprecated? (It's gone in Py3k.)
>>
>> I wouldn't like that, but it is beside my point.  If a module is
>> deprecated, then it should not be used in released code.
>> If mhlib is deprecated, it doesn't tell you about it.  mhlib uses
>> multifile and multifile does tell you it is deprecated, and that is
>> pretty annoying.
> 
> This is because no one has gotten around to it. Create a bug report for
> it, and preferably attach a patch with tests.

My point is, as a matter of *policy*, nothing should be released that
uses deprecated stuff.  I can't create a bug report about wrong (or
incomplete) policies.

> Eric.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/sjoerd.mullender%40cwi.nl

-- 
Sjoerd Mullender

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 371 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100219/b187aad0/attachment-0001.pgp>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097780.html below:

[Python-Dev] deprecated stuff in standard library