On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote: > and particularly the discussion on page 8 that starts "Were there no > way to get rid of NaNs ...". I don't think it covers hypot, but the Whoops. I should have reread that article myself. The behaviour of hypot *is* mentioned, on page 7. Mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4