Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: >> Of course, PEP 291 could do with a list of 2.5 and 2.6 specific features >> first... > > I think that section is rather pointless to keep updated, since a good > list can be found in the what's new documents. What people really need > to do is run the unittests on all supported versions. It's handy as a list of big ticket items to avoid, especially those that can significantly affect the way you structure code. Agreed that the main enforcement should be to run those tests on the relevant older versions. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4