RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 13 03:35:44 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097647.html

2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
>>> Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>>>> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox.
>>> One other point - is there a Python 2.6 backwards compatibility
>>> restriction on 2to3 at the moment? If there isn't, should there be?
>>
>> I try to keep it compatible with 2.6, since we have to backport changes.
>
> With 2.7 just around the corner, it should probably be listed in PEP 291
> on that basis.

Done.

>
> Of course, PEP 291 could do with a list of 2.5 and 2.6 specific features
> first...

I think that section is rather pointless to keep updated, since a good
list can be found in the what's new documents. What people really need
to do is run the unittests on all supported versions.

-- 
Regards,
Benjamin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097647.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 385 progress report