RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 13 03:02:07 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097644.html

2010/2/12 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>>> IMO, it is realistic to predict that this will not actually happen. If
>>> we can agree to give up the 2to3 sandbox, we should incorporate
>>> find_pattern into the tree, and perhaps test.py as well.
>>
>> I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox.
>
> Besides, if we're using hg, it should make it much easier for someone
> else to branch that part of the stdlib and create a standalone 2to3
> release from it if they really want to.

I personally like 2to3 in a separate repo because it fits well with my
view that 2to3 is an extra application that happens to also be
distributed with python.

-- 
Regards,
Benjamin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097644.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 385 progress report