RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 12 20:34:58 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097633.html

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> Why even keep 2to3 in the sandbox?  It should be mature enough now to be
>> maintained directly in the tree.
>
> I think the original plan was to make standalone releases, so that
> people could upgrade their installation from a newer release of 2to3.
>

That's what I remember as well.

> IMO, it is realistic to predict that this will not actually happen. If
> we can agree to give up the 2to3 sandbox, we should incorporate
> find_pattern into the tree, and perhaps test.py as well.

I vote on giving up the 2to3 sandbox.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-February/097633.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 385 progress report