On 2010-02-09 15:57 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Is there a better third-party framework for use in these cases? As > Olemis points out later in this thread, I don't think it's good for the > ‘unittest’ module to keep growing for uses that aren't focussed on unit > tests (as contrasted with other kinds of tests). nosetests allows you to write such module-level and class-level setup and teardown functions. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4