On Feb 03, 2010, at 09:26 AM, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: >On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:14:44PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: >> I don't understand the distinction you're making between those two >> options. Can you explain what you mean by each of “siblings” and >> “folder-per-folder”? > >sibilings: the original proposal, i.e.: > >foo.py >foo.pyr/ > MAGIC1.pyc > MAGIC1.pyo > ... >bar.py >bar.pyr/ > MAGIC1.pyc > MAGIC1.pyo > ... > >folder-per-folder: > >foo.py >bar.py >__pyr__/ > foo.MAGIC1.pyc > foo.MAGIC1.pyo > foo.MAGIC2.pyc > bar.MAGIC1.pyc > ... > >IIUC Correct. If necessary, I'll define those two terms in the PEP. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100206/38fe3ced/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4