On Feb 05, 2010, at 07:37 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >Brett Cannon wrote: >> Does code exist out there where people are constructing bytecode from >> multiple files for a single module? > >I'm quite prepared to call YAGNI on that idea and just return a 2-tuple >of source filename and compiled filename. Me too. I think a 2-tuple of (source-path, compiled-path) is probably going to be fine for all practical purposes. I'd assign the former to a module's __file__ (as is done today in Python >= 2.7) and the latter to a module's __cached__. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100206/768b4165/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4