RetroSearch Browse

Wed Dec 8 22:09:45 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106599.html

On 12/8/2010 2:00 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:

> Actually, I don't think my response to Nick's post (about concurrent.futures)
> could be characterized as "I don't care", as I even made a specific proposal
> about how a change could be implemented.

Your proposal struck me as probably the best way forward. Can you code 
it up and put a patch on the tracker that people can test before the 
next beta?

A couple of other notes:
1. The number of participants in this thread is probably larger than 
average. So I think the responses so far can be taken as representative 
of those here who care enough to say something.
2. To me, Django is more an app framework than a mere 'library', and one 
with extra problems of error reporting in that it needs to send messages 
to both client and server and possibly elsewhere. So I as a user would 
expect it to embody extra thought about message disposition relative to 
a typical library.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106599.html below:

[Python-Dev] Using logging in the stdlib and its unit tests