On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom at gmail.com> wrote: .. > It seems, e.g. in Perl, there are some omissions too > http://perldoc.perl.org/perlunicode.html#Unicode-Regular-Expression-Support-Level > > Do you know of any re engine fully complying to to tr18, even at the > first level: "Basic Unicode Support"? > I would say Perl comes very close. At least it explicitly documents the missing features and offers workarounds in its reference manual. I am actually not as concerned about missing features as I am about non-conformance in the widely used features such as digits' matching with '\d'.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4