Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106465.html below:

[Python-Dev] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py
• Next message: [Python-Dev] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:08:43 -0800
"Gregory P. Smith" <greg at krypto.org> wrote:
> Sleeping on the issue some more and pondering it...
> 
> Is there any _good_ reason not to just make the close_fds default change in
> 3.2 today?  No warning (since they're never seen by most people anyways).
>  Document it in Misc/NEWS and whatsnew.rst.

Yes, it will break many scripts under Windows.
That's the core of the issue, really. I agree under Unix it makes
sense to change the default.

Regards

Antoine.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py
• Next message: [Python-Dev] r87010 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/subprocess.rst Lib/subprocess.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4