RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 18 21:00:48 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103132.html

On 18/08/2010 21:59, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord:
>    
>> Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
>> 2.7 as stable?
>>      
> I think the answer is "no, it could not".
>
> How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and
> regenerate them? There is also
>
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.5/
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.4/
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.3/
>
> etc.
>
> In particular,
>
> http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.2/
>
> still lists 3.1 as in-development.
>
> If that would be fixed, I think the fix should work for all
> documentation sets, and such a fix might be difficult to implement.
>
>    

Ok, fair enough.

Michael

> Regards,
> Martin
>    

-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103132.html below:

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation