Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> I seem to recall there was some issue (aside from the current lack of a >> reliable OS X buildbot) that prevented us from regularly grabbing the >> head of the tree and using it to automatically build the Windows and Mac >> installers (to check that the installers could actually be created, >> preventing a repeat of the Mac situation with 2.7b1). >> >> Am I misremembering the discussion from last time this topic came up? > > I only remember a similar discussion, which was about why the Windows > nightly builds had been dropped. The reason was that the process was too > flaky and required too much manual fixing, and that the demand for these > binaries was too low. I don't recall OSX being mentioned in that > discussion, though. Yep, that sounds like the discussion I was thinking of. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4