At 12:51 PM 4/7/2010 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: >On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:45 PM, P.J. Eby ><<mailto:pje at telecommunity.com>pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: >Examples under debian: > >  docutils/__init__.py      ->   located in >/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ >  ../../../bin/rst2html.py    ->  located in /usr/local/bin >  /etc/whatever          ->   located in /etc > > >I'm wondering if there's really any benefit to having >../../../bin/rst2html.py vs. /usr/local/bin/rst2html.py.  Was there >a use case for that, or should we just go with relative paths ONLY >for children of the libdir? > >(I only suggested this setup in order to preserve as much of the >prefix-relativity proposal as possible, but I wasn't the one who >proposed prefix-relativity so I don't recall what the use case is, >and I don't even remember who proposed it.  I only ever had a >usecase for libdir-relativity personally.) > > >Yes, in a virtualenv environment there will be >../../../bin/rst2html.py that will still be under the (virtual) >sys.prefix, and the whole bundle can be usefully moved around. Ah, ok. Good! +1, then.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4