On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > I should note that I've softened my position slightly from what I posted > yesterday. I could live with the following compromise: > > >>> x = IPv4Network('192.168.1.1/24') > >>> y = IPv4Network('192.168.1.0/24') > >>> x == y # Equality is the part I really want to see changed > True > >>> x.ip > IPv4Address('192.168.1.1') > >>> y.ip > IPv4Address('192.168.1.0') > With those semantics, IPv4Network objects with distinct IP addresses (but the same network) could no longer be stored in a dictionary or set. IMO, it is a little counter-intuitive for objects to compare equal yet have different properties. I don't think this is a good compromise. -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090928/a40aec1b/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4