Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-September/092187.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If you think getopt and optparse should stick around in 3.X, why is
> that? If you think there are things that getopt and optparse do better
> than argparse, could you please give some examples?

I personally consider getopt superior to both optparse and argparse.
Those are terribly verbose in specifying arguments, whereas getopt's
sequence-of-letters is really nice and compact.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4