Peter Moody <peter <at> hda3.com> writes: > > > (or would you argue that Address objects should have an optional distinguishing > > port number, for "convenience" reasons?) > > I'm not sure what you're talking about, I've never argued to add layer > 4 information to ipaddr. It was an analogy, just like your "float" analogy. > I'm not sure what annoys you about this. I have already explained it: what annoys me is that it makes `Network` a hybrid object conflating two independent concepts, and makes the library less understandable as a result. Others have already pointed out that it makes operations like equality confusing. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4