On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:47:41 am Dino Viehland wrote: > > So I am +1 on unified the message and +1 on using the "does not > > support indexing" one. > > I'd be +1 on the unified message as well - but it seems what that > message should be may be contentious (and quite a bike shed > discussion at that). The bug David linked to > (http://bugs.python.org/issue5760) has a preference for subscript > because that's what's used elsewhere in the language. For what it's worth, "unsubscriptable object" seems to me to be mysterious to many newbies, and even a few non-newbies. It took me something like seven years of coding to stop reading it as "unscriptable object", and I'm sure I won't be the only one. As far as I can see, in practice, people talk about obj[i] as the item at index i, not the item at subscript i -- the term "subscript" in this context seems to be rare to non-existent except for the error message. -- Steven D'Aprano
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4