On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:29:21 pm Peter Moody wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Andrew McNamara > > <andrewm at object-craft.com.au> wrote: > >>off to patch the pep and implement some of the non controversial > >> changes. > > > > It might be a good idea to add some use-cases to the PEP. > > There are several use-cases in the PEP already. > > The problem is, for every use-case where one can show that the > existing implementation is confusing, I can come up with a use-case > showing where the existing implementation makes more sense than > anything proposed. Please excuse my skepticism, but I find that hard to believe. Given the current API, to test if an address is in the same network as another address, you write: addr_a in addr_b Can you please give a use-case where that makes more sense than the suggested alternative: addr_a in addr_b.network -- Steven D'Aprano
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4