RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 17 20:47:35 CEST 2009 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-September/091853.html

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:41:37 am Andrew McNamara wrote:
> In the olden days, the mask was spelled out in octets (eg
> 255.255.255.0). But we've moved to a more compact and logical
> notation where the number of leading significant bits is specified
> (eg /24).

I hope you're not suggesting the older notation be unsupported? I would 
expect to be able to use a mask like 255.255.255.192 without having to 
count bits myself.

-- 
Steven D'Aprano

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-September/091853.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.