Eric. "Greg Ewing" <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: >Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> Or, to put it another way, given an arbitrary host in a network (e.g. >> your own machine or the default gateway) and the netmask for that >> network, calculate the network address. > >Some people have claimed that the gateway address of a >network isn't necessarily the zero address in that network. >If that's true, then you *can't* calculate the network >address from a host address and a netmask -- there isn't >enough information. Furthermore, an IPNetwork object >needs to be able to represent a network address whose >address part contains bits that aren't in the mask. I don't see why that would be considered a network address, then. It sounds to me like that's a host address plus a netmask.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4