Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> writes: >> I don't see any valid reason for entering a network as "192.168.1.1/24" rather >> than the canonical "192.168.1.0/24". The former might indicate a typing error >> or >> a mental slip, so let's be helpful and signal it to the user. > > Or perhaps there can be an optional "strict=True" (or "strict=False") argument > to the constructor / parsing function. If so, I hope that we'd default to strict=True.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4