Guido van Rossum wrote: > +1 on trying this. Constructing a 116MB string by concatenating 1KB > buffers surely must take forever. (116MB divided by 85125 recv() calls > give 1365 byte per chunk, which is awful.) The HTTP/1.0 business looks > like a red herring. > > Also agreed that this is an embarrassment. Embarrassment eradicated ;-) http://bugs.python.org/issue6838 Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4