On 1 Sep 2009, at 03:03 , Gregory P. Smith wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz > >wrote: > >> Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >> Did your coworker run any timings instead of basing his assumptions >> on >>> bytecode >>> size? >>> >> >> In any case, what are you suggesting -- that the last value >> returned by a function call in the body should be the >> default return value? >> >> I don't think the unpredictability that would introduce >> would be a good idea. >> > > gads no. we're not shell or perl! don't do that :) "We" are not Erlang, Smalltalk, OCaml or Haskell either, sadly.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4