On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Raymond Hettinger <python <at> rcn.com> writes: >> >> [Chris Bergstresser] >> Still, I think my >> > point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get(). >> >> Not really. One looks-up a key and supplies a default value if not found. >> The other, set.get(), doesn't have a key to lookup. > > set.getone() then ? ugh- other spellings much preferred. Geremy Condra
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4