[Chris Bergstresser] Still, I think my > point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get(). Not really. One looks-up a key and supplies a default value if not found. The other, set.get(), doesn't have a key to lookup. A dict.get() can be meaningfully used in a loop (because the key can vary). A set.get() returns the same value over and over again (because there is no key). Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4