RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 27 18:33:29 CET 2009 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093400.html

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
> Sorry to nitpick, but there is no list.get().

   No?  How ... odd.  I guess it wouldn't have come up, but I was sure
there was a .get method which took an optional default parameter if
the index didn't exist, mirroring the dict method.  Still, I think my
point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get().

-- Chris

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093400.html below:

[Python-Dev] Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it