Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Alexander Belopolsky > <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: >> To me, however, a set seems to be a container that is a specialization >> of a dict with values and keys being the same. > > That's absurd; the mapping provides nothing useful. Given Alexander's premise, I agree with your response. But his premise is wrong. Python's current builtin set class maps abstract equivalence classes to representative members. And this *is* useful. Mapping arbitrary members of such classes to representative members, sometimes called 'canonical', is a standard problem/goal in math. String interning is an application of this idea. Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4