I'd like to get a second opinion on bug 7183: http://bugs.python.org/issue7183 The Boost folks have reported this as a regression in 2.6.3, making it a candidate for Python 2.6.4. IIUC, the latest version of Boost fixes the problem in their code, but if it really is a regression it could affect other projects and should probably be fixed. Robert Collins from the Bazaar team pinged me on IRC and originally thought that they'd been bitten by this problem too, though he looked around and determined it probably did /not/ affect them after all. So we have only anecdotal evidence of a problem, and no reproducible test case. If the Python 2.6.4 release is to be held up for this issue, we need to know today or tomorrow. Come the weekend, I'm going ahead with the tag and release. Holding up the release will mean another release candidate, and a wait of another week for the final. So does anybody else think bug 7183 should be a release blocker for 2.6.4 final, or is even a legitimate but that we need to fix? Thanks, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091022/77694045/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4