Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093047.html below:

[Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Eric> I haven't tested it, but I still see WITHOUT_COMPLEX in trunk and py3k 
    Eric> branches. In py3k, it's referenced in:
    ...

Sure, but is it ever exercised?  A name like WITHOUT_COMPLEX suggests that
it should be flipped on/off by configure using --without-complex, but that
script doesn't know about it and it's not mentioned in pyconfig.h.in, where
the various --with-* flags work their magic.

Skip

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4