On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Scott Dial wrote: > >> I suspect this release is primarily to quench the problems with >> distutils, but.. >> >> http://bugs.python.org/issue5949 >> >> doesn't seem to have been addressed by you. And this seems like it would >> be another unfortunate loss of an opportunity. > > I want us to be very careful about 2.6.4. This isn't a normal bug fix > release, it's specifically there to remove the brown paper bag of 2.6.3 from > our heads. So let's be conservative and fix this one in 2.6.5. > > -Barry > Here's another one barry: http://bugs.python.org/issue7120 We should get this in - it's a regression I introduced awhile ago for environments without the multiprocessing module using logging. jesse
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4