Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> writes: > > Daniel Stutzbach <daniel <at> stutzbachenterprises.com> writes: > > > > -1 on 1.+0 on 2.It'd be nice if we could postpone the resize if there are > active iterators, but I don't think there's a clean way to track the iterators. > > I've started experimenting, and it seems reasonably possible using a simple > guard class and a set of weakrefs. Open issue and proposed patch at http://bugs.python.org/issue7105 Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4