On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > The one unfortunate thing about this proposal is how this is going > to mean I have to install a package potentially four times if I want > it available to all possible Python interpreters. Then again, the > chances of anyone beyond the people on this mailing list using more > than a single interpreter regularly is so small that bothering to > add support for yet another user directory that works on any Python > interpreter will not be worth it. > Yeah, I imagine that the use-case of wanting to re-use a shared set of packages between multiple interpreter implementations is relatively small. But if you did want to do so, you could just export the location for your (PYTHONIMPLEMENTATIONNAME)PATH to the location you want to re-use and off you go ... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091010/a160cd64/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4