Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>> - distribute.entrypoints: that's the old pkg_resources entry points
>>> system, but on its own. it uses distribute.resources
>> Why not get it into the core as distutils.entrypoints? That's where it
>> belongs...
>
> What do you call 'core' ? distutils.core ?
Sorry, mean stdlib. distutils.entrypoints would seem to be the sensible
place.
>>> - distribute.index: that's package_index and a few other things.
>>> everything required to interact with PyPI. We will promote
>>> its usage and see if Pip wants to use it as a basis.
>> Why not call in "pypi.client" and "pypi.server" or, better yet, get it into
>> the stdlib as disutils.index.client distutils.index.server?
>
> We are keeping a "distribute." namespace for all bits.
Why?
> In any case, the splitting is occuring *now* and is not written in the stone,
> so we can talk about this in Distutils-SIG, and improve it with your feedback.
Shame there hasn't been any discussion of this recently on distutils-sig...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4