P.J. Eby <pje <at> telecommunity.com> writes: > For example, having a packages reddit (nb: open source, written in > Python), where people can upvote or downvote packages and leave > comments. That's probably the minimum amount of checks and balances > required to avoid problems of the sort the PyPI commenting feature is > already having, since others will be able to reply to the comments, > and downvote nonsense into oblivion. Seems like a reasonable idea, given that there's already a Python reddit which seems popular. There was also www.cheeserater.com (which appears down at the moment) which was a Django demo site (source available at http://github.com/jacobian/cheeserater) for rating PyPI packages. I just created a "cheeseshop" sub-reddit to play around with. > (Alternatively, shutting off the comment system would also > work. Nothing stops people from using Google to search for "foo > sucks" or "problems using foo" if they want to research what's been > said about a package.) Yes, but it's good to have all the feedback in one place, if possible. Regards, Vinay Sajip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4