A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094326.html below:

[Python-Dev] buildtime vs runtime in Distutils

[Python-Dev] buildtime vs runtime in Distutils [Python-Dev] buildtime vs runtime in DistutilsChristian Heimes lists at cheimes.de
Thu Nov 19 10:55:32 CET 2009
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Now for the format problem, I agree that it seems more robust to
> pre-process the variables
> and inject them in the stdlib when ./configure is run.
> 
> I am not sure what is the best strategy here, but I would rather not
> add yet another
> configuration file (wether its an xml format or an ini-like format).
> 
> So what I am proposing is to inject those values in a private dict in
> the new sysconfig.py module,
> that can be read through the get_config_vars / get_config_var APIs.
> 
> This means that sysconfig.py will be added as "sysconfig.py.in"

Are you planing to implement the proposal for Windows, too? There may be
no need to change the code because we have full control over the
official installers. Also the VisualStudio Windows build doesn't use
./configure but hand crafted header files. You'd have to fall back to a
hand crafter sysconfig.py.

Christian
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4