Antoine Pitrou skrev: > It certainly is. > But once again, I'm no Windows developer and I don't have a native Windost host > to test on; therefore someone else (you?) has to try. > I'd love to try, but I don't have VC++ to build Python, I use GCC on Windows. Anyway, the first thing to try then is to call timeBeginPeriod(1); once on startup, and leave the rest of the code as it is. If 2-4 ms is sufficient we can use timeBeginPeriod(2), etc. Microsoft is claiming Windows performs better with high granularity, which is why it is 10 ms by default. Sturla
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4