Neal Becker wrote: > "format_spec ::= [[fill]align][sign][#][0][width][.precision][type]" > "The precision is ignored for integer values." > > In [36]: '%3x' % 10 > Out[36]: ' a' > > In [37]: '%.3x' % 10 > Out[37]: '00a' > > Apparently, precision is _not_ ignored? Apparent typo reports should go to the tracker, along with version information. In this case, the Format Specification Mini-Language is for the new str.format() and format() facilities, not for % formatting, which is described in Old String Formatting Operations. Ironically, you report does point to a doc problem: precision is actually not allowed for integer types. 3.0.1 >> format(10, '3x') ' a' >>> format(10, '.3x') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#2>", line 1, in <module> format(10, '.3x') ValueError: Precision not allowed in integer format specifier >>> '{0:3x}'.format(10) ' a' >>> '{0:.3x}'.format(10) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#4>", line 1, in <module> '{0:.3x}'.format(10) ValueError: Precision not allowed in integer format specifier http://bugs.python.org/issue5963 Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4