On Sat, Mar 28, 2009, andrew cooke wrote: > Mark Hammond wrote: > [...I wrote] >>> >>> i'm discussing a programming language, not the size of your dick. >> >> Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions :) Is there something you feel >> the need to get off your chest? > > i'm not sure how this has ended up in python-dev; i was responding in > python and if you read that group my comments may have made a little more > sense (there were some hysterics in a separate thread accusing me of > saying python was "dying" because i was concerned about how the discussion > groups had evolved). There certainly was no such accusation. You said that c.l.py was in "decline" (your own word), and I made reference to the ancient "Usenet is dead, news at 11" meme. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/0b3fbfcdb92ae0e3 Mark's question seems pertinent. ;-) -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "At Resolver we've found it useful to short-circuit any doubt and just refer to comments in code as 'lies'. :-)" --Michael Foord paraphrases Christian Muirhead on python-dev, 2009-3-22
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4