A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087463.html below:

[Python-Dev] GSoC: Core Python development tools

[Python-Dev] GSoC: Core Python development tools [Python-Dev] GSoC: Core Python development toolsAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Mar 23 23:09:56 CET 2009
Martin v. Löwis <martin <at> v.loewis.de> writes:
> 
> P.S. I don't believe your claim that it forgot changesets. Could it be
> that it simply forgot adding files, and that it did so because you
> already had the files in the sandbox, so that the merging failed?

It's more weird actually, it actively forgot some changes in some files but some
other changes in the /same/ files did get merged. 

> P.P.S. Are you sure you have to re-merge when somebody commits
> something unrelated to the branch? Or just when somebody else merges
> as well?

Perhaps only the latter, I'm not sure actually.
(but it can also happen that the "unrelated" commit modifies some files you were
merging changes in...)



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4