Aahz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> After Hrvoje's message, let me rephrase my suggestion. Let's instead allow: >> open(..., sync_on="close") >> open(..., sync_on="flush") >> >> with a default of None meaning no implicit syncs. > > That looks good, though I'd prefer using named constants rather than > strings. I would agree, but where do you put them? Since open is a built-in, where would you suggest placing such constants (assuming we don't want to pollute the built-in namespace)? -- Scott Dial scott at scottdial.com scodial at cs.indiana.edu
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4