A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/086777.html below:

[Python-Dev] patch commit policies (was [issue4308] repr of httplib.IncompleteRead is stupid)

[Python-Dev] patch commit policies (was [issue4308] repr of httplib.IncompleteRead is stupid) [Python-Dev] patch commit policies (was [issue4308] repr of httplib.IncompleteRead is stupid)Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 12:19:30 CET 2009
Chris Withers wrote:
> That aside, is it actually a python-wide policy to *forbid* patching
> older releases where the patch isn't security-related?
> 
> I can understand the "no more releases unless there are security
> problems", but what's the harm in applying a patch to an old version
> branch on the off chance that a security release might be made some time?

Precisely because if we're doing a security release, we want to be sure
that that the *only* change that gets included is the fix to the
security problem. If there are other changes hanging around on the
branch, then the release would need to go at least a single release
candidate cycle (which we don't want to need to do for security releases
on old branches).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4