A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089885.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issues with process and discussions (Re: Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr)

[Python-Dev] Issues with process and discussions (Re: Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr) [Python-Dev] Issues with process and discussions (Re: Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr)Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Jun 4 02:23:19 CEST 2009
Michael Foord wrote:

> if you are added as nosy on a tracker item (which happens 
> when you make a comment or you can do yourself) then you get emailed 
> about new comments.

That's good, but...

> only going to the tracker to add responses.

is not so good. If the goal is to ensure that all previous
discussion on a given issue is reliably recorded, then
email replies ought to be archived under the relevant
ticket automatically.

For me at least, having to go somewhere special to
post a reply would be too error-prone. I get a large
number of Python-related messages in my inbox from
a number of sources, and I don't usually pay much
attention to exactly where they're coming from. I just
hit reply-all and trust that it will go somewhere
sensible.

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4