-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> > wrote: >> Great! Then should we start planning for 3.0.1 in terms of release >> dates and what to have in the release so we can get this out the door >> quickly? > > I think considering there's only two release blockers we should plan > for about a week or two from now. > > I'm not sure if we want to do a release candidate; we didn't for > 2.6.1, but maybe it would be good to see if the community can find any > other horrible problems. Let's JFDI. No release candidate. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSYRWa3EjvBPtnXfVAQIVpgQAo1tb/RJ81WFBJHH1GhdhtKagrB5p9MSl U+GfnLx9mEtqBqQ9rnXaQQaPpJjvNmXc10K+8oDdwCJHSX3k66JbK4U4BOBqWgc3 0PTrdIn5/4PqfexT3HWNmH/mZCZXb36HDcE6fxW5CWxuxHbNLypBY7P52XgVJIBW hqMBQVVNxgw= =Zq3w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4